Ezt a kommentet írtam oda amúgy, kaptam is érte a fejemre
Megjegyzések • 788
Írj nyilvános megjegyzést...
NESRockman1987
NESRockman19873 hónapjaKAPCSOLT MEGJEGYZÉS
In the reality, the late-nomadic Vlachs (romanians) migrated from
Bulgaria and South-Eastern Serbia to the present-day territory of
Romania in the 13th century. The nationalistic daco-romanian continuity
myth (which is the compulsory curriculum for children in romania) is not
generally accepted by western academic scholars. That's why all major
Western Encyclopedias (E.Encarta, E. Britannica, E.Americana, German
Brockhaus, French Larousse etc...) mention the romanian state-supported
daco-romanian myth, but they are also mention the reality: the Vlach
migration from the Balkans in the 13th century.
Vlachs
(medieval romanians) were the latest people who introduced the literacy
in Europe, and they were one of the latest shepherd nomadic people in
Europe. (There were no orthodox bishopry in medieval Vallachia &
Moldavia, most of the monks and priests had to be „imported” from
Serbia). Due to the lack of literacy and own history writting (medieval
chronicles) until the 16th century, the poor romanians had to built up a
so-called "speculative history-writting" (or fabricated history), where
speculations based on earlier speculations and fictions etc..
There are no material proofs (cemetries cultic places) which can support the
romanian (vlach) existence in present-day territory of romania before
the 1200s. There are no CONTEMPORARY written documents about the
existence Vlachs in the territory of later Vallachia Moldavia
Transylvania before the 1200s.
WERE WERE YOU HIDING for 800 years dear "daco"-romans?
The neo-latin elements in Romanian language remain the best proof agaist
daco-roman theory. Unlike other neo-latin languages, there are no proofs
for development of dacian language into a neo-latin language, because
there are not remained dacian vocabulary for the posterior. The dacian
conquest was the shortest lasting conquest of the Roman Empire in
Europe, it lasted only 160years, the relations between the roman legions
and dacians remianed hostile. (Note: The contemporary multi-ethnic
legionaries were Roman citizens, but they were recruited from various
primarily multinational, non-Latin provinces, so THEY WERE NOT ROMANS )
This very short & hostile circumstance are not an ideal contingency
for romanization process. There are no CONTEMPORARY historic records for
the survive of dacians after the Roman withdrawal, and later the
territory was the FOCAL POINT of great migrations (serials of many
strong powerfull and brutal barbaric tribes and people such as Huns,
Goths, Gepids Longobards, Avars, Pechenegs and Cumans.). There are tons
of contemporary written documents (chronicles from early medieval to
high medieval age etc.) about the sheprherd nomad Vlachs in Balkan
peninsula, but there are no material or written proofs for their
existence in the present-day territory of Romania before the 1200s.
However the roman rule lasted for 500+ years in many territories of
Balkan peninsula (where vlachs were often mentioned by many early
medieval chronicles) There is also no trace of lingual influence from
any of the other peoples who lived in Transylvania after the withdrawal
of the Romans, the Huns, Goths, Gepids Longobards, Avars, Pechenegs and
Cumans. If these languages did not have any influence on the Rumanian
language, we can be sure that this is proof that at that time there were
no Wallachian settlers in Transylvania. During the creation of romanian
literary language and language reforms, the high ratio of south-slavic,
albanian and turkic words were purged from old romanian language, and
they were replaced by adopted modern italian french and other neo-latin
words and even expressions (which were not belong to the ancient latin
and vulgar latin language)